How do they compare? Mizuno mp- vs. Nike vr ... like the mp-62 vs. vr split/half cavity?

Question

How are these clubs similar and what makes each unique?

Answer 1

There isnt a huge difference between these two, however there still is some minor tweaks that make them different. The face of the mizuno seems to sit more close at address, so either their lofts are a little lower or the club sits more upright. Also, the feel of the mizuno is much better in my opinion. The mizuno name has quickly jumped in iron technology. The mp series has been very popular with good players for 5 years or so now, but so has nike so. Compare the price and what shafts come with them, and you probably wont go wrong with either.

Answer 2

no different. Mizuno clubs are manufactured in a different way. If you really like blades ... don't hesitate to buy an older set because just like the Ping eye2, Ping isi ... etc. They were just a year newer. I have a set of mp14 ... and they hit just as good as a set of MP-32 ... the MP-62 is just the next gen or "run" of the same class of iron ..



I think that anything new, 1 or 2 year old would be great set to try. They are really easy to get used to and if the lie is wrong you can just Bend em.

Answer 3

They are very similar clubs because neither are blades. They both have the same technology backing them with a bit of both worlds. Blade for control. Cavity back for forgiveness. I believe the VR's are in a class of there own. I really like how Tiger had direct input not only into his own clubs, but for clubs suitable to all levels of play. Undeniably the VR's are a better buy. But try them first, you will not be let down.

Answer 4

You will find that they are likely almost identical. Nike has Tiger Woods "authorize" all club designs. It is a well known fact that Tiger is fond of Mizuno Irons.

Answer 5

mizuno is like butter. smooth